Tsawwassen First Nation has announced plans to develop the largest mall in British Columbia, in south-west Metro Vancouver. The Tsawwassen Mills mall (plans here) is inspired by the success of Cross Iron Mills and Vaughan Mills near Calgary and Toronto respectively, and will cover an area larger than Metrotown.
It came as quite a shock to me that such a classic suburban mall could be built, on undeveloped agricultural land and in the second decade of the twenty-first century, as we battle the high economic and environmental costs of fossil fuel dependency.
Across North America, the tragic mistakes of twentieth century car-centric development are plain to see and the race is on in the other direction: to retrofit developments for a more sustainable future. To take just two local examples, Richmond is enthusiastically encouraging mall owners to redevelop with mixed-use zoning, and Larco has applied to rezone the Arbutus Centre in Vancouver, putting townhouses where there was once surface parking. The Globe and Mail just last week reported on ”a new breed of suburbanites … demanding better transit. They want cafes, shops and schools within walking distance.”
Shopping malls, single-use zoning, car-dependent communities and low-density sprawl are relics of an age now past. And yet this is the plan for south-west Metro Vancouver.
The human and economic costs of such development are well known. Children raised in car-dependent neighbourhoods suffer higher levels of obesity and are less independent than those able to walk, bike or take transit to school, to friends etc. Car dependency costs individuals more, in traffic jams and commuting times, and in fuel costsas oil prices rise. Municipal services, from water and electricity to policing and fire protection, cost more in spread-out and inaccessible cul-de-sacs. (For more, see this excellent photo-series from The National Geographic and the video “Built to Last“.)
Furthermore, by developing the area as surface car-parking and commercial units, TFN is failing to maximize the economic value of their land. Studies in Florida and North Carolina suggest that a community of “three- to four-story, mixed-use buildings containing spacious apartments could generate … more than five times as much per acre as [a] mall.” The legacy of the Tsawwassen First Nation could be like the landowners of historic West London, who built a mixed-use grid outside the main city. Or for a more local example, Westbrook Village near UBC (Google map) is an attractive 100 acre community built around a grid of walkable streets, for both residential and commercial use.
Instead, this 175 acre space is to be developed as just another North-American shopping mall. And on top of some of the best farmland in beautiful British Columbia to boot.
There is a little more back-story. Ivanhoe, TFN’s development partner, has been itching to develop a mall in BC since at least 2005. Concerns over unhealthy and unsustainable development were raised in 2007, but the Vancouver Sun assured readers that “Tsawwassen First Nation would develop its land in a way that fits into the broad plans” of Metro Vancouver, including the non-sprawl, sustainability goals of the region. Chief Kim Baird is quoted in that article: ”Yes, we’ll develop our lands. But don’t forget, we live there, too. We want to do it right.”
All indications are that within two generations the climate and fuel supply system of British Columbia will have changed to such a degree as to be barely recognizable. By then today’s tragically shortsighted design choices will be painfully obvious.
Epilogue: Metrotown in Burnaby, currently the biggest mall in BC, is retrofitting civic spaces and car-free density. Cue gushing hyperbole (but no less valid for it) from the developer:
>>>
“It really is the template for a new, more sophisticated building for Burnaby,” Maurice Pez, Intracorp’s senior vice-president of development, said in a phone interview. He compared the vision for the project to areas like Kitsilano and Robson Street in Vancouver, and Lonsdale Avenue in North Vancouver, calling it “an urban high street.”
<<<
http://www.burnabynow.com/business/Metrotown+project+planned/4607770/story.html
A lively discussion going on over at
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=189535
>>>
Tsawwassen FN has had quite a bit of success with residential development to date:
1. Stahaken – A higher end residential subdivision comprising ~100 homes along northwest Tsawwassen/English Bluff constructed during the 1980’s with 99-year leaseholds. They have never had problems with resale and the subdivision is well maintained;
2. Tsatsu Shores – A condominium complex at the base of Tsawwasen Beach constructed during the 1990’s (visible from Ferry Causeway) also with 99-year leaseholds; as far as I know, they have never had problems with resale either.
<<>>
I thought malls were obsolete? There must be a better way to build shopping malls today that make them much more pedestrian friendly.
Have underground parking, and create a series of retail streets and maybe have a central plaza with food vendors. Maybe have some residential on top of the retail.
I think most people enjoy shopping along Robson and Granville a lot more than being indoors in the sterile environment of a mall.
<<<
More lively commentary on news1130’s site http://www.news1130.com/news/local/article/212676–researcher-plan-to-build-bc-s-largest-mall-is-outdated including this funny one, slightly off topic!
>>>
I just hope these natives set up some of those “cheap tobacco” retail outlets like they have in Quebec as part of this development. Tobacco taxes got too damn high under Campbell’s nanny state.
<<<
Kevin, thanks for the comment. I’m afraid I don’t have a quick answer to that, and really hoped this blog post would lure some well-informed urban planners out of the woodwork. I’ve emailed Patrick Condon to see whether his class might work on it. Here was the work from the class of 2010: http://www.urbanstudio.sala.ubc.ca/2010/book%20templates.html
I imagined mixed residential and commercial rents from a more grid-like community design, with parking underground, would generate at least similar income to a surface parking mall, and be a more resilient business model in the face of fuel price shocks.
Can you point to a source, or some rough-and-ready math, that rents from denser design wouldn’t cover building costs?
New report just published:
Transportation Transformation: Building complete communities and a zero-emission transportation system in BC by Patrick Condon, Eric Doherty, Kari Dow, Marc Lee, Gordon Price. April 19, 2011 http://www.policyalternatives.ca/transportationtransformation
“This study lays out a plan for a 30-year initiative that would transform the ways in which people and goods move across our province. This in turn will create complete communities with affordable housing choices, more and better jobs, and a better quality of life for all British Columbians.”
“replacing a vast sea of mall parking with housing, offices and other services would greatly increase opportunities for people to live closer to where they work and play, and to transit hubs.”
The story’s been picked up by the Delta Optimist here: http://www.delta-optimist.com/Mall+concept+outdated+analyst/4646850/story.html
I hope it’s clear that the views expressed on this blog are mine alone, and may not reflect an official stance of ISIS, Sauder School of Business or UBC.
The Optimist’s reporter, Sandor Gyarmati, hasn’t been in touch, but seems to cover lots of stories on sustainable low-carbon communities:
“Future flooding risk in Delta” http://www.delta-optimist.com/news/Plotting+future+without+flooding/3370755/story.html
“Municipal/urban farming” http://www.delta-optimist.com/business/Municipally+enabled+agriculture/2826036/story.html
“Building energy efficiency” http://www.delta-optimist.com/technology/Delta+looks+energy+costs+civic+precinct/2826434/story.html
[...] Salmond, at the ISIS Research Centre at UBC, takes on the Tsawwassen First Nations proposal for Tsawwassen Mills: It came as quite a shock to me that [...]
Another thought for Kevin (and other interested parties) is the Southlands proposal highlighted by Gordon Price here http://pricetags.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/wheres-the-outrage/
Professor Price linked to the developer’s site http://www.imaginesouthlands.ca/ but this presentation has more images of the “market square” and “integrated agriculture” concept http://www.corp.delta.bc.ca/assets/CPD/PDF/public_forum_presentation5_hodgins.pdf and they seem to have really investigated ways to minimise transportation externalities in this document: http://www.imaginesouthlands.ca/sites/default/files/PDF/TDM-Options-For-Southlands-Mar2010.pdf
I’d love to see the equivalent documents for Ivanhoe/TFN’s proposal.
Desperate sprawl developer gives away cars with houses http://www.grist.org/sprawl/2011-04-26-desperate-sprawl-developer-gives-away-cars-with-houses
New data just out from the US National Association of Realtors 2011 Community Preference Survey. Sounds a lot more like the City of Vancouver and Southlands development, than the Tsawwassen plans.
>>>
The ideal home today is located closer to the workplace and mass transportation and in a neighbourhood that’s denser and mixed use, with amenities and businesses – parks, pharmacies, grocery stores, doctors offices, schools, restaurants – that can be walked to.
But what I find so interesting and sort of counter-intuitive is how this new American dream smacks against the old dichotomy of city and suburb. Americans may be willing to settle for smaller, they may prefer denser development, but they still relish their privacy. They want a detached house with its own walls and a yard.”
<<<
Secondary source: The Atlantic. Primary source: National Association of Realtors
Another datapoint for TFN to chew over:
>>>
Online shopping grew by its fastest rate in nearly four years in the US last month as rising fuel prices prompted Americans to cut trips to malls and buy on the internet instead, according to MasterCard Advisors.
<<<
http://news.google.ca/news/more?ncl=dbc0kNkETEpMa-MIB73UVfkfq_-hM
Protect farmland, buy local, Metro Vancouver residents say in survey
http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Protect+farmland+local+Metro+Vancouver+residents+survey/4728226/story.html
Surrey Mayor Watts also uses LA as short-hand for bad urban design: http://www.francesbula.com/uncategorized/mayor-watts-comes-out-swinging-on-the-gas-tax/
Tsawwassen Chief Kim Baird, September 5th 2011
These early years, as she puts it, are critical: “Autonomy is awesome, and the opportunity is huge,” she says, “but we need to be careful not to squander things. We have to have the right deals and the best use of the land as a base of sustainability.”
http://www.bcbusinessonline.ca/profiles-and-spotlights/people/lunch-with-kim-baird-tsawwassen-first-nations-chief
In response to Kevin, who wrote above: “The sorts of mixed use development which you cite (Arbutus, UBC) is not economical on land in such a suburban community as a better-designed mall would not generate enough revenue to finance the additional building costs.”
I offer this recent snippet: “Like a long list of malls in the United States – and a small but growing number in Canada – Décarie Square is counting on alternatives to traditional retailing to help it survive at a time when competition for the retail dollar is fiercer than ever.”
http://www.montrealgazette.com/health/changing+face+malls/5625453/story.html
I submit that malls are less economical than villages (residential, offices, retail in walkable proximity). I’d love someone to show me the numbers though.
Plans for a 26 acre mixed-use brownfield development across the pond:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-24000460-ikea-to-sell-eco-homes-for-olympics.do
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/28ea9bf6-f9a1-11e0-a805-00144feab49a.html#axzz1cfwFqS8n
http://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/construction-news/ikea-starts-work-on-1200-home-olympic-park-housing-development
Some inspiration for TFN here, perhaps?
Update on the development here: http://www.bclocalnews.com/business/133631113.html
1. Apparently single-use zoning is called “mixed-use development”.
2. The entire TFN development could include 120 acres of retail commercial development; 355 acres of industrial land located adjacent to Deltaport; and 325 acres of residential lands.
3. Wal-Mart, Lowe’s and Canadian Tire mooted as tenants.
“We are working … to ensure that the design highlights and promotes Tsawwassen First Nation and Coast Salish culture and traditions”
“On Jan. 18, 2012, Tsawwassen First Nation members will vote on a proposal that includes building two large-scale mall developments spread over 180 acres of their land.” http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/134459573.html
“People do travel from a greater distance, so the trade area is significantly larger than a typical shopping centre
…
these projects are expected to generate more traffic in the area
…
a traffic study is now under review by TFN and the Ministry of Transportation to identify projected demand for infrastructure and improvements
…
An environmental assessment [is] also underway.”
As a reminder, here is an alternative proposal nearby: http://www.corp.delta.bc.ca/assets/CPD/PDF/public_forum_presentation5_hodgins.pdf Imagine if TFN built this: they could be landowners of a vibrant town, including retail, light manufacturing etc.
Speaking of Southlands, here’s a quick update on that: http://www.delta-optimist.com/news/Southlands+issue+looms+over+campaign/5717627/story.html
“Even if the member approval is positive, there’s still some additional approvals that need to be secured. For example, there’s the typical municipal-type approvals – subdivisions, rezoning, development permits. So we still have a number of steps to go through,” said Hartman.
http://www.delta-optimist.com/business/Mall+projects+moving+forward/5777498/story.html#ixzz1fDKJKz3i
I hope the municipality of Delta demands a mixed-use transit village be built on the land instead.
Vaughan Mills http://www.braunperio.com/images/map.jpg and Crossiron Mills http://www.crossironmills.com/images/experience/devPhoto.jpg are the models. Instead lets skip that and build this http://www.p4sc.org/articles/all/sprawl-repair-shopping-mall
More alternative inspiration: Daybreak near Salt Lake City, Utah
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-05/walk-bike-to-work-in-salt-lake-s-answer-to-suburban-nightmares.html
http://www.daybreakutah.com/
Morgan Heights in Surrey http://www.morgancrossing.ca/gallery/neighbourhood/
Chief Kim Baird responds on the following day’s CBC Early Edition
http://www.cbc.ca/earlyedition/podcast/2012/01/06/politics-in-lillooet-big-development-in-tsawwassen-and-crowded-er-rooms/
It’s very important to stress my critique is not anti-development. My concern is the amount of space given over to parking and the fact that there will be no residential space built on the mall site, so that all demand is expected to come from elsewhere. I don’t believe that single-use zones are an economically sustainable use of the land: walking to the store is better than driving to it.
Please see the following links for some alternative ways the site could be developed:
* Century’s Southlands, just across the street http://www.corp.delta.bc.ca/assets/CPD/PDF/public_forum_presentation5_hodgins.pdf
* Morgan Crossing in Surrey http://www.morgancrossing.ca/gallery/neighbourhood/
* Daybreak near Salt Lake City, Utah http://www.daybreakutah.com/
* One fictional idea for retrofitting a mall space, for inspiration:
http://www.planetizen.com/node/46481
If these sorts of mixed-use new urbanist designs have been considered and rejected, then great: I’d be fascinated to see the analysis that came to that conclusion.
Finally, I liked the way Century/Southlands investigated ways to minimise transportation externalities in this document: http://www.imaginesouthlands.ca/sites/default/files/PDF/TDM-Options-For-Southlands-Mar2010.pdf I’d love to see the equivalent documents for Ivanhoe/TFN’s proposal.
I learned a couple of things from this interview (skip to 12m30s)
http://www.cbc.ca/ontheisland/2011/05/17/tsawwassen-mega-mall-proposal/
1. Ivanhoe Cambridge are the real estate subsidiary of the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec. You can read about the Caisse’s responsible investment principles here http://www.lacaisse.com/en/investments/responsible-investment The sustainable development officer is Ginette Depelteau http://www.lacaisse.com/sites/all/files/medias/en/responsabilite/documents/plan_action_developpement_durable_en.pdf
2. Mixed use means hotel plus stores. (To my mind: no it doesn’t.)
3. A bus will bring people from YVR airport and from the port (to Vancouver Island). I’d love to read the analysis that came to that conclusion.
“Caisse set to be a force in mega-malls”, Globe & Mail 2005
The Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec plans to invest up to $1-billion to roll out three more mega-malls in major Canadian cities in the next four to six years with its U.S. partner Mills Corp.
The move follows the success of the joint venture’s first project, Vaughan Mills, a huge 1.2-million-square-foot shopping, discount and entertainment complex north of Toronto and would include sites in Calgary, Vancouver and Montreal.
Since opening its doors last fall, Vaughan Mills has attracted more than 6.5 million shoppers. More than half of those visitors travelled more than 16 kilometres to come, Mr. Gleeson said.
http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/showthread.php/4722-Vaughan-Mills
Another unhelpful Baird-vs-NIMBY dichotomy on CKNW this morning: http://www.cknw.com/Channels/Reg/News/TheBillGoodShow.aspx
I want to stress again that my critique is not anti-development. I do not align myself with Ian Paton, who wants TFN to be held to the same ALR-strictures as South Delta farmers.
Instead, my concern is the amount of space given over to parking and the fact that there will be no residential space built on the mall site, so that all demand is expected to come from elsewhere. In short I’m worried the site is being badly designed for a five-year flip not multi-decade growth. I don’t believe that single-use zones are an economically sustainable use of the land: walking to the store is better than driving to it.
Everybody who gives the matter any thought understands development is important to improve the lives of TFN band members. The point is that a Quebec-owned mall of international chain-stores is a short-sighted way to do it: it won’t provide sustainable growth, it locks the area into the costs of auto-dependence and it will impose huge traffic and pollution externalities on the region.
Here are some ideas for alternative ways the site could be developed, creating jobs but creating a community at the same time:
* Century’s Southlands, just across the street http://www.corp.delta.bc.ca/assets/CPD/PDF/public_forum_presentation5_hodgins.pdf
* Morgan Crossing in Surrey http://www.morgancrossing.ca/gallery/neighbourhood/
* Daybreak near Salt Lake City, Utah http://www.daybreakutah.com/
* One fictional idea for retrofitting a mall space, for inspiration:
http://www.planetizen.com/node/46481
>>>
Objectives: To emphasize walking, cycling, transit use and other forms of non-automobile travel over private vehicle use for trips to and from the community by ensuring non-automobile travel is safe, convenient, and accessible.
<<<
http://www.tsawwassenfirstnation.com/TFN_Land_Use_Plan.pdf
A great comparison of parking-out-front (Mills style) vs parking in the back.
http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2011-nov-beach-hodges-a-disaster-of-jacksonvilles-making
Transit consultant Jarrett Walker likes to illustrate his “be on the way” principle with Laguna West, a new town planned with a transit hub that was impossible to serve. You can read more about it here: http://books.google.ca/books?id=Y98oPkGTCKQC&lpg=PA195&ots=JZBiQ5ebHQ&dq=jarrett%20walker%20laguna%20west&pg=PA195#v=onepage&q&f=false and about three quarters of the way through this presentation http://www.actpla.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/10377/Jarrett_Walker_presentation.pdf Jarrett presented this concept recently at SFU as part of his book launch http://www.sfu.ca/continuing-studies/events/2012/01/human-transit-the-book.html
Now take a look at the TFN land use plan, prepared in collaboration with Aecom, in particular the location of the village centre in the Preferred Land Use Concept on page 43 (marked in red). http://www.tsawwassenfirstnation.com/TFN_Neighbourhood_Plan_March_2011.pdf
The plan does note that “All Rights of Way are estimates only, subject to detailed engineering review. Bike and transit provisions require specific engineering review.” I hope the reviewers consider Laguna West.